| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152 | /* * This file is part of the StarPU Handbook. * Copyright (C) 2009--2011  Universit@'e de Bordeaux 1 * Copyright (C) 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014  Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique * Copyright (C) 2011, 2012 Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et Automatique * See the file version.doxy for copying conditions. *//*! \page Scheduling Scheduling\section TaskSchedulingPolicy Task Scheduling PolicyBy default, StarPU uses the simple greedy scheduler <c>eager</c>. This isbecause it provides correct load balance even if the application codelets do nothave performance models. If your application codelets have performance models(\ref PerformanceModelExample), you should change the scheduler thanksto the environment variable \ref STARPU_SCHED. For instance <c>exportSTARPU_SCHED=dmda</c> . Use <c>help</c> to get the list of available schedulers.The <b>eager</b> scheduler uses a central task queue, from which workers draw tasksto work on. This however does not permit to prefetch data since the schedulingdecision is taken late. If a task has a non-0 priority, it is put at the front of the queue.The <b>prio</b> scheduler also uses a central task queue, but sorts tasks bypriority (between -5 and 5).The <b>random</b> scheduler distributes tasks randomly according to assumed workeroverall performance.The <b>ws</b> (work stealing) scheduler schedules tasks on the local worker bydefault. When a worker becomes idle, it steals a task from the most loadedworker.The <b>dm</b> (deque model) scheduler uses task execution performance models into account toperform an HEFT-similar scheduling strategy: it schedules tasks where theirtermination time will be minimal.The <b>dmda</b> (deque model data aware) scheduler is similar to dm, it also takesinto account data transfer time.The <b>dmdar</b> (deque model data aware ready) scheduler is similar to dmda,it also sorts tasks on per-worker queues by number of already-available databuffers.The <b>dmdas</b> (deque model data aware sorted) scheduler is similar to dmda, italso supports arbitrary priority values.The <b>heft</b> (heterogeneous earliest finish time) scheduler is deprecated. Itis now just an alias for <b>dmda</b>.The <b>pheft</b> (parallel HEFT) scheduler is similar to heft, it also supportsparallel tasks (still experimental). Should not be used when several contexts usingit are being executed simultaneously.The <b>peager</b> (parallel eager) scheduler is similar to eager, it alsosupports parallel tasks (still experimental). Should not be used when several contexts using it are being executed simultaneously.\section TaskDistributionVsDataTransfer Task Distribution Vs Data TransferDistributing tasks to balance the load induces data transfer penalty. StarPUthus needs to find a balance between both. The target function that thescheduler <c>dmda</c> of StarPUtries to minimize is <c>alpha * T_execution + beta * T_data_transfer</c>, where<c>T_execution</c> is the estimated execution time of the codelet (usuallyaccurate), and <c>T_data_transfer</c> is the estimated data transfer time. Thelatter is estimated based on bus calibration before execution start,i.e. with an idle machine, thus without contention. You can force busre-calibration by running the tool <c>starpu_calibrate_bus</c>. Thebeta parameter defaults to <c>1</c>, but it can be worth trying to tweak itby using <c>export STARPU_SCHED_BETA=2</c> for instance, since duringreal application execution, contention makes transfer times bigger.This is of course imprecise, but in practice, a rough estimationalready gives the good results that a precise estimation would give.\section Power-basedScheduling Power-based SchedulingIf the application can provide some power performance model (throughthe field starpu_codelet::power_model), StarPU willtake it into account when distributing tasks. The target function thatthe scheduler <c>dmda</c> minimizes becomes <c>alpha * T_execution +beta * T_data_transfer + gamma * Consumption</c> , where <c>Consumption</c>is the estimated task consumption in Joules. To tune this parameter, use<c>export STARPU_SCHED_GAMMA=3000</c> for instance, to express that each Joule(i.e kW during 1000us) is worth 3000us execution time penalty. Setting<c>alpha</c> and <c>beta</c> to zero permits to only take into account power consumption.This is however not sufficient to correctly optimize power: the scheduler wouldsimply tend to run all computations on the most energy-conservative processingunit. To account for the consumption of the whole machine (including idleprocessing units), the idle power of the machine should be given by setting<c>export STARPU_IDLE_POWER=200</c> for 200W, for instance. This value can oftenbe obtained from the machine power supplier.The power actually consumed by the total execution can be displayed by setting<c>export STARPU_PROFILING=1 STARPU_WORKER_STATS=1</c> .On-line task consumption measurement is currently only supported through the<c>CL_PROFILING_POWER_CONSUMED</c> OpenCL extension, implemented in the MoviSimsimulator. Applications can however provide explicit measurements byusing the function starpu_perfmodel_update_history() (examplified in \ref PerformanceModelExamplewith the <c>power_model</c> performance model). Fine-grainmeasurement is often not feasible with the feedback provided by the hardware, sothe user can for instance run a given task a thousand times, measure the globalconsumption for that series of tasks, divide it by a thousand, repeat forvarying kinds of tasks and task sizes, and eventually feed StarPUwith these manual measurements through starpu_perfmodel_update_history().\section StaticScheduling Static SchedulingIn some cases, one may want to force some scheduling, for instance force a givenset of tasks to GPU0, another set to GPU1, etc. while letting some other tasksbe scheduled on any other device. This can indeed be useful to guide StarPU intosome work distribution, while still letting some degree of dynamism. Forinstance, to force execution of a task on CUDA0:\code{.c}task->execute_on_a_specific_worker = 1;task->worker = starpu_worker_get_by_type(STARPU_CUDA_WORKER, 0);\endcodeNote however that using scheduling contexts while statically scheduling tasks on workerscould be tricky. Be careful to schedule the tasks exactly on the workers of the correspondingcontexts, otherwise the workers' corresponding scheduling structures may not be allocated orthe execution of the application may deadlock. Moreover, the hypervisor should not be used whenstatically scheduling tasks.\section DefiningANewSchedulingPolicy Defining A New Scheduling PolicyA full example showing how to define a new scheduling policy is available inthe StarPU sources in the directory <c>examples/scheduler/</c>.See \ref API_Scheduling_Policy\code{.c}static struct starpu_sched_policy dummy_sched_policy = {    .init_sched = init_dummy_sched,    .deinit_sched = deinit_dummy_sched,    .add_workers = dummy_sched_add_workers,    .remove_workers = dummy_sched_remove_workers,    .push_task = push_task_dummy,    .push_prio_task = NULL,    .pop_task = pop_task_dummy,    .post_exec_hook = NULL,    .pop_every_task = NULL,    .policy_name = "dummy",    .policy_description = "dummy scheduling strategy"};\endcode*/
 |