|
@@ -352,9 +352,19 @@ static unsigned try_to_find_reusable_mem_chunk(unsigned node, starpu_data_handle
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
+static int _starpu_data_interface_compare(void *interface_a, struct starpu_data_interface_ops_t *ops_a,
|
|
|
+ void *interface_b, struct starpu_data_interface_ops_t *ops_b)
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
+ if (ops_a->interfaceid != ops_b->interfaceid)
|
|
|
+ return -1;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ int ret = ops_a->compare(interface_a, interface_b);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ return ret;
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
starpu_mem_chunk_t _starpu_memchunk_cache_lookup(uint32_t node, starpu_data_handle handle)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
-#warning This is not a sufficient criterium, we need a compare function in the interface structure ...
|
|
|
uint32_t footprint = _starpu_compute_data_footprint(handle);
|
|
|
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_wrlock(&mc_rwlock[node]);
|
|
@@ -367,6 +377,10 @@ starpu_mem_chunk_t _starpu_memchunk_cache_lookup(uint32_t node, starpu_data_hand
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
if (mc->footprint == footprint)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
+ /* Is that a false hit ? (this is _very_ unlikely) */
|
|
|
+ if (_starpu_data_interface_compare(&handle->interface[node], handle->ops, mc->interface, mc->ops))
|
|
|
+ continue;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
/* Cache hit */
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Remove from the cache */
|